Former Chief Justice Sophia Akuffo has spoken out strongly against the dismissal of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo, arguing that the process lacked fairness and transparency.
In a televised interview on September 2, Akuffo criticized the proceedings that led to Torkonoo’s removal, calling them a “rigmarole” and warning that the situation sets a troubling precedent for judicial independence in Ghana.
Her remarks come in the wake of President John Dramani Mahama’s September 1 decision to remove Justice Torkonoo following a recommendation from an Article 146 investigative committee. The committee had been tasked with assessing a petition alleging “stated misbehaviour” on the part of the Chief Justice.
Although the government insists it acted in accordance with constitutional provisions, the process has sparked widespread concern and criticism from legal experts and political commentators alike.
Akuffo, who also serves on the Council of State, expressed disappointment with how the matter was handled. “She was denied a fair hearing,” she said. “Even if it wasn’t a formal trial, it was treated as if it were a treason case.”
The retired Chief Justice questioned the weight of the allegations, suggesting they were insufficient to warrant the removal of the judiciary’s highest-ranking official. “The accusations didn’t carry the kind of seriousness that should lead to such a consequential decision,” she added.
Her comments echo earlier statements made by Justice Torkonoo, who described the removal process as both “cruel” and unconstitutional.
Other legal figures, including former Deputy Attorney General Alfred Tuah-Yeboah, have also condemned the dismissal, calling it a blow to judicial independence and alleging it was politically motivated.
The incident has sparked renewed public debate over the separation of powers and the integrity of Ghana’s constitutional institutions.
In closing, Akuffo voiced a hopeful appeal: “May no Chief Justice or judge ever again be subjected to such a painful ordeal.”
