The Minority in Parliament has criticized President John Dramani Mahama’s decision to scrap fuel allowances and allocations for all political appointees, describing it as a populist gesture and a mere public relations tactic.
On July 15, President Mahama announced the cancellation of fuel payments and distributions to political appointees as part of government efforts to reduce spending and promote fiscal discipline.
Speaking on the floor of Parliament, Akuapem North MP Sammy Awuku questioned the government’s seriousness, urging more concrete steps. “If the President wants to truly commit to this fuel allowance cut, I challenge them to shut down the fuel depots at the Castle and Jubilee House so no free fuel is taken,” Awuku said.
He also sought clarity on who qualifies as a political appointee under the directive. “Does it include ministers, CEOs, presidential staffers? Who exactly are these political appointees?” he asked.
Awuku further demanded transparency on the expected savings. “How much is currently spent on these allowances, and what savings will scrapping bring? Are political appointees expected to refund fuel costs or pay out of pocket?” he questioned.
He also expressed doubts about practical enforcement, citing examples like the Minister for Communication’s official trips. “If a minister drives to Ada or Ningo-Prampram on government business, will the fuel used be reimbursed or accounted for? Or will there simply be no fuel at all?” he asked.
Awuku concluded, “I see this as just a populist PR stunt.”
However, the NDC’s Komenda-Edina-Eguafo-Abirem MP, Samuel Atta Mills, defended the move, calling it a “great idea” and highlighting the excess number of government vehicles. “It’s a good example that political officeholders should buy their own fuel,” he said.
Mills emphasized the need for sacrifice among public officials. “Members of Parliament buy their own fuel; no allowance is given to us. Ministers who are also MPs buy their own fuel too. It’s a small sacrifice for the nation,” he added.
The debate reflects ongoing tensions over fiscal reforms and transparency in government spending as the administration pushes to tighten belts amid economic challenges.
